Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MJ Polk's avatar

I’d like to mention that I cut out a section where I rambled a bit, after I read the excerpt from The Power of Now in my narration. But basically I’d just said that I was using that as an example of a different way of interpreting Jesus’ words. And that I hope it would inspire others who aren’t Christian to look at his words in a new light. As much as I pretend to discount them in this essay, there is much that can be learned from those scriptures. And now for my view on the church sign-

Here’s a picture of a church sign in a local community. When we passed it, and I first read it, I was taken aback. “Wow,” I said to my Sweetheart. She asked me, “What is it?” So I read her the sign and asked her what she thought. And she’d had the same initial response as I had. She said, “That’s ugly, they could have done without that last part.” “Exactly, it’s judgy,” I said. “It’s like they’re pointing their finger and sticking their tongue out, going ‘nana-boo-boo, Jesus even loves you’.”

Y’all the thing is, I think that they fail to see what it might look like from another perspective. They’re too close to it, maybe if they looked at it as a passer by would, it would read differently. And for me, it’s a good example of how they often participate in the world. I think that sign is like the idiot screaming about the rapture from a speaker outside of sporting events – it’s more likely to push people away from Christianity, than bring them to trust it as a life philosophy.

Craig Sefa's avatar

I completely get where you are coming from. The only thing that kept me "Christian" was realizing that all the ways you describe Christianity in the beginning are exactly what you said, "hijacked" versions mostly for political power all the way back to the beginning.

A lot of Christians are not actually interested in Jesus at all and many who don't identify as Christian follow him better than I. I find hope in the fact that Jesus never actually converted people to a religion, but to a way of life, and that he elevated a polytheistic Roman centurion as an example of faith.

Not trying to sway you at all, but you may be interested in Open Relational Theology which emphasizes a version of Christianity that leans into the human agency you describe. It is also compatible and growing as a philosophy among Buddhists and many other religions because it does not demand conformity to a particular faith. It is more about a way of seeing God's interaction with and influence in the world in partnership with human agency rather than over and against. If you're interested, I recommend the book, "God Can’t" by Tom Oord as a starting point.

I for one am grateful that the hijacked versions of any faith are not the only way. Without getting back to the original intent of those early wisdom teachers who the traditions were based on, every path can become destructive to individuals and society in varying degrees.

Stay curious and blessings to you in the new year.

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?